Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the military service are now mandatory in numerous nation. The author of the reading states that unless any issue occur the forces are not required hence it should not made compulsory. The lecturer mentions that they are imperative as they ensures nation's security and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that there has been instances of countries such as European union, canada and so on which are not under any threat neither now or nor in future as well. Thus, rather spending fund on forces these could be use for promoting social programs. The professor believes there are flaws in the wroter's position. He contends that making it mandatory will surely benefit the nation eventhough they are not suffering crisis as they will have enough militaries in case of emergency to ensure safety.
Secondly, according to the writing in order to train forces, more and more resources are required. In addition, they are recruited for short term so there will be inefficient use of materials and there is no guarantee of good return from these forces as well. The speaker on other hand points out that indeed they could aid needy one rather than spending on training. Yet, it is not wastage of fund on military as well because trained forces can better provide services than the untrained one. Furthermore, untrained forces are susceptible to make inefficient use of resources. Finally, the reading passage also notes that it should be made compulsory for whole nation as few armries are enough to deal with threats. Moreover, this could result in a nation fully controlled by political police force. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that if made mandatory they can be well prepared for eventual threats. Additionally, although there is not presence of geographical problem yet there are numerous prevailing conflicts owing to the politics. Thus, such situation can be handled effectievely by these military forces.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on advantage of making military force compulsion. The speaker effectievely challenges the writer's argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...es are not required hence it should not made compulsory. The lecturer mentions that ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ed hence it should not made compulsory. The lecturer mentions that they are imperat...
^^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'ensure'
Suggestion: ensure
...ntions that they are imperative as they ensures nations security and attacks each of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: NEITHER_NOR[1]
Message: Use 'nor' with neither.
Suggestion: nor
...ch are not under any threat neither now or nor in future as well. Thus, rather spe...
^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...The speaker effectievely challenges the writers argument.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 360.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10833333333 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6002003128 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 145.348785872 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552777777778 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 419.366225166 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2202434975 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.95 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190002082716 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489199431414 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569202757646 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108722306978 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688498040598 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.