Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how
they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to
type your response.
The article states that zoos are essential in our modern world and they make value to animal’s life. But the professor in the lecture opposes with this idea. Not only he persists that there are lots of problems with the argument mentioned in the article, but also he states that zoos do not have benefits for society and even animals themselves.
As the first reason that the article mentioned, that it was: animals are treated well in zoos, the professor exampled a death incident of two pandas by exposing to rat poison in a zoo. He related this incident to lacking care and preventing of safety managers.
Another reason that was mentioned in the article was the educational aspect of the zoos. But the professor declares that averment by proving the statement which says: the presence of animals in the zoos is for entertainment. He gives an example about the zoos that aggregate animals to attract visitors and this has just one message, that is: use animals even if it is artificial and misleading exhibits.
As the last reason, the article claims that the zoos protect endangered species and cites an example of a kind of monkey, Taamar. The professor admits that case but states that it was just one successful sample and asserts the success rate is low. He also contends the way of saving endangered species is to interbreed them with their families, which causes birth defects. At last, he refutes all of the claims in the article by saying the zoos have no advantage to animal’s habitats.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 394, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...uses birth defects. At last, he refutes all of the claims in the article by saying the zoo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56919334381 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530769230769 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3432322563 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.083333333 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0103829710307 0.272083759551 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00403383927888 0.0996497079465 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00908443820035 0.0662205650399 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00661549635129 0.162205337803 4% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00667936992284 0.0443174109184 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.