summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage.
In this set of materials, the reading part explains three reasons for extinction that occurred in the Terriosoid era and the listening section refutes the information presented in the passage, and, argues that there are not enough documents in order to improve the claims are introduced in reading section. and she says that all of the reasons are mistakes and then she illustrates her reasons for denying that reasons.
First, the passage points that the first reason for mass-extension is decreasing sea level. However, the lecture makes the point that sea-level fluctuating had occurred for several million years and mass-extinction occurs for several years so that she said this reason cannot make extinction of species.
Second, according to the text, massive climate cooling gets extinction. the speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that the pollution od so2 disappeared from the air after some years and this pollution was nor long enough to create an extinction.
Third, the article claims that stride an asteroid made extinction of species. on the contrary, the lecturer points out that striding an astroid occurred 12m years before extinction occurred so that this event is not a suitable reason for extinction.
In conclusion, the talk bolsters, the mentioned pieces of information in the passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | salarmoheb | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | salarmoheb | 90 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
- some people to take a position in a company and work for the company. other people think it is better to go into business for themselves. which do you think is better? give reasons and examples to support your response. 80
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 80
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 76
- how do this idea in listening passage cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage? 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...aims are introduced in reading section. and she says that all of the reasons are mi...
^^^
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d in reading section. and she says that all of the reasons are mistakes and then she illus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...assive climate cooling gets extinction. the speaker disagrees with this point, and,...
^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...an asteroid made extinction of species. on the contrary, the lecturer points out t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, then, third, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33492822967 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76132522749 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.6112558946 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.888888889 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108670923198 0.272083759551 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460035999304 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291676959549 0.0662205650399 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582717205971 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160384145818 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.