Both the reading and the listening discuss whether online encyclopedia is less valuable than traditional, printed encyclopedia or not. The former presents three major problems related to online encyclopedia but the lecture contradicts with each of the points.
First of all, The author claims that online encyclopedia has access to anyone to provide information thus there could be a lot of inaccurate information in it. However, the professor states that traditional, printed encyclopedias also have errors. She adds that there is no online or offline sources that are perfect and error less. In online encyclopedia it is easier to correct mistakes or errors where in traditional papers it is very hard to correct them.
Second of all, the reading passage mentions that hackers or unauthorized users can fabricate the information in online sources. In contrast, the lecture rebuts that critical important information are protected by putting them only read-only format. There are also some special editors who monitors the changes made and fixes the malformed data.
Finally, the text passage says that online encyclopedias contain depth information and so much confusing to find what is most important and relevant. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that online encyclopedias have unlimited space and can provide information on variety of articles and diversity if topics. Whereas in offline or traditional, there is only limited space which does not contain elaborated information.
This is how the author and the lecturer disagrees with each other.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, thus, whereas, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5041322314 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8943559962 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582644628099 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4642410359 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.461538462 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176172477778 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063157780944 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532197362658 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920317871197 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718579426227 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, thus, whereas, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5041322314 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8943559962 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582644628099 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4642410359 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.461538462 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176172477778 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063157780944 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532197362658 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920317871197 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718579426227 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.