The main topic of both the reading and the talk is whether maintaining a human presence on Venus is possible or not. Whereas the author posits that it would be impossible, the lecturer refutes this claim, casting doubt on every single point made by the author.
First, the reading passage holds the view that atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is greater than the pressure at Earth's surface. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that if the floating station is established fifty kilometers upon the Venus' surface, the pressure would have not been too high and nothing would be crushed.
Second, in contrast to the reading, which claims that there is no source of water and oxygen on Venus' surface, the lecturer states that there are chemical procedures which are able to produce water and oxygen using the material on the Venus' such as carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. As a result, water and oxygen would not have to be supplied to Venus from Earth.
Finally, according to the reading passage significant percent of sunlight is reflected back into space because of the presence of the thick clouds that fill the atmosphere. However, the professor makes it clear that clouds above 50 kilometers Venus' surface are not as thick as nearby clouds. Therefore, the sunlight could get through these clouds. The professor asserts that the clouds could reflect the light, so the solar power cells would be able to get both reflect and direcet sunlight. As a result, humans coud get enough electricity to power their machines.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, in contrast, such as, as a result, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95736434109 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40950945904 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9615983446 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.272727273 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.533768472205 0.272083759551 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181667628586 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909697242902 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284995726723 0.162205337803 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766244589228 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.