Team work
The reading and the lectuer are both about which better for working to work on team or individually. The authoe of the reading believes that working on team has a lot of advanteges. The lectuer cast doubt on the claims made in the article. He thinks that working in team might cause a lot of problem for the project.
First of all, the author points out that a group of people is more skillful because they share their knowlege and expertises. This pont is challenged by the lecturer. He says one of the companies made a team woek to work on its project, and it found that the members of the team could not share the ideas because one or two of the members of the team refused the ideas without iny discussion.
Secondly, the authoe contends that the huge resources which members of the team have lead to work more quickly and gives a creative solution to problems and issues. The article notes sometimes the member individually can not take arisky decision, but the team work is more likely to take dangerous decisions. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests the team work in the company could not reach to a good solution for the problems, and they were unresposibility.
Finally, the author states that the conterbutions of the member in a team will be better than individually because he or she want to be more active in his or her groub and try to show off and comptitive in the decisions. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the company found 1 or 2 from the members who contribute and the other just go after them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...orking on team has a lot of advanteges. The lectuer cast doubt on the claims made i...
^^^
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of problems'.
Suggestion: a lot of problems
...thinks that working in team might cause a lot of problem for the project. First of all, the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 126, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...ter than individually because he or she want to be more active in his or her groub a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54838709677 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53840884848 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498207885305 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0643015363 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6153846154 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.479279359817 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185087232282 0.0996497079465 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170346173524 0.0662205650399 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304849122885 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164931976574 0.0443174109184 372% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 12.2367328918 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.