team work in a project
The reading and the lecture are about teamwork for a project. The author of the reading feels that working with a team has many
benefits. However, the professor challenges all the claims made by the author and explains hereunder.
First of all, the lecturer says that when a project is given to a group of people, they do not get any free right to access everything
as they get when they work as an individual person and the success is not recognized when people work in a group. he also adds
the point that all the credit will be given to the whole group, even though, few people of that group worked on it by putting their
entire efforts. On the contrary, the reading mentions a group can work faster than individual work. Additionally, the
problems will get solved easily because they got many expert candidates in their group. Moreover, making risky decisions
can be avoided when working with a group of people.
Secondly, the writer posits that working in a group can be more rewarding and also very fruitful to the Team members who
make decisions. On the other hand, the tutor argues that the project will not be accomplished quickly as they need many
consents to process a single project. It happens because all the people in a group should agree on the same word. He also adds
the point that half of the people in a group can influence others and other's ideas cannot be triumphant in the presence of
influencers. Furthermore, when influencers propose a creative plan, others might not be in their favor and it falls apart.
Eventually, the blame of the failed project will be on everyone, even who was on the positive side to implement their project
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...recognized when people work in a group. he also adds the point that all the credi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73129251701 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46236186834 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506802721088 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2356770214 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3571428571 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 4.09492273731 342% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284785961469 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102108963009 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881015753522 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103399846395 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913862633259 0.0443174109184 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.