Theories about risk-taking personality
The article states that "universal risk taking personality" is a type of personality in which people tend to risk their own as well as others life at the cost of nothing or just pleasure. The article provides three reasons to support the stand. However professor explains that Natural risk takers are much more enthusiastic and confident on task they are doing and refutes each of the author's reason.
First the arcticle states that People with this type of personality tend to take risk in every part of life. The professor refutes to this point by saying that this people doesn't take risk in every part of their life. He provides example of banker, who remains on safe side in his banking work, while the same takes risks as a motorcyclists.
Second, the arcticle states that this people tend to risk their own aa well as others life with no reason or reward. How ever the professor says that, this risk takers are confident on what they are doing. And also states that risk taking generates positivity and self esteem. Profesoor describes about reward in terms of physical and chemical changes explaining this by giving the example of skydivers.
Third the reading says that people take risk to hide their inadequacy by providing the example of student and adults. The professor opposes to this point by saying that people who take risk are socially and financially much more successfull.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...des three reasons to support the stand. However professor explains that Natural risk ta...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...or refutes to this point by saying that this people doesnt take risk in every part o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...o this point by saying that this people doesnt take risk in every part of their life. ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a motorcyclist' or simply 'motorcyclists'?
Suggestion: a motorcyclist; motorcyclists
...ing work, while the same takes risks as a motorcyclists. Second, the arcticle states that th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ts. Second, the arcticle states that this people tend to risk their own aa well a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: HOW_EVER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'however'?
Suggestion: However
...s others life with no reason or reward. How ever the professor says that, this risk take...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92857142857 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57775420671 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.116997792494 1709% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2454685819 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.75 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307691503724 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124052408642 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745517537346 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204404991385 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282894956925 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.