There has been discussion about the noises that sailors Russian submarines have heard during their patrolletion on the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. The lecturer argues that the theories that are mentioned by author are not true. While, the author contends that these theories are referred to the sailors detections.
The first area of dispute is the theory which suggest that the noise is caused by orca whales during the courtship ritual. The professor argues that this theory may be plausible but is highly unlikely to be true because orcas live near the surface of the ocean. The sound is heard from the deep ocean. However, this directly refutes the reading passage which states that noise that sailors heard was caused by orcas when they want to attract a mate.
The second point of dispute is about the thought that the sound was caused by giant squid.
The professor argues that sailors heard these noises from the1960s and continued for two decades. A question is raised about the disappearance of these noises in the following years. Again, this, contradicts what is stated in the reading passage that squid have a complex brain so they were able to emit sounds.
The final argument concerns the Russian submarines that picked up sounds from some military technology, like another country’s submarines that were secretly patrolling the area. The professor said that this theory doesn’t hold up because submarines can’t change direction so quickly. Also, the engines of these ships are not silence enough, the technology is not developed enough to build these quiet underwater ships. However, the text ignores these potential explanations.
Summing up, the professor presents three arguments to counter the author’s claims.
There has been discussion about the noises that sailors Russian submarines have heard during their patrolletion on the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. The lecturer argues that the theories that are mentioned by author are not true. While, the author contends that these theories are referred to the sailors detections.
The first area of dispute is the theory which suggest that the noise is caused by orca whales during the courtship ritual. The professor argues that this theory may be plausible but is highly unlikely to be true because orcas live near the surface of the ocean. The sound is heard from the deep ocean. However, this directly refutes the reading passage which states that noise that sailors heard was caused by orcas when they want to attract a mate.
The second point of dispute is about the thought that the sound was caused by giant squid.
The professor argues that sailors heard these noises from the1960s and continued for two decades. A question is raised about the disappearance of these noises in the following years. Again, this, contradicts what is stated in the reading passage that squid have a complex brain so they were able to emit sounds.
The final argument concerns the Russian submarines that picked up sounds from some military technology, like another country’s submarines that were secretly patrolling the area. The professor said that this theory doesn’t hold up because submarines can’t change direction so quickly. Also, the engines of these ships are not silence enough, the technology is not developed enough to build these quiet underwater ships. However, the text ignores these potential explanations.
Summing up, the professor presents three arguments to counter the author’s claims.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t are mentioned by author are not true. While, the author contends that these theorie...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cas live near the surface of the ocean. The sound is heard from the deep ocean. How...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3024911032 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52951573778 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555160142349 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.541019331 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.125 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0625 7.06452816374 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391580876343 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130492908433 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167154311074 0.0662205650399 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211528178146 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.283174823664 0.0443174109184 639% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.