TPO-18 integrated writing task
The reading and the lecture are both about the reasons of the decline of Torreya. The reading passage claims three ways to address this decline. As opposed to, the lecturer who counters-argues that viewpoint, trying to prove that these three ways do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that scientists should reestablish Torreya in the same location in which it thrived in the past. A microclimate would help the growth of this tree despite the weather condition in the large region. Therefore, the tree would thrive. On the contrary, the lecturer cannot disagree more, reasoning that the climate in small places is highly effected by the large region, you cannot separate those. Consequently, the global warming will effect all the regions in the same way.
The second argument the author gives is that scientists should move Torreya to an entirely different location. In addition, they have seen that this tree can be grown in places with a cool weather. However, the professor cannot be more outraged, explaining that if Torrya thrive in that new environment that would effect other trees and animals that live there. So, that would threaten the other species because the competition would be high for survival.
Lastly, on one hand, the passage points that scientists should preserve Torreya in research center. Monitoring environment where the tree will be growing, it would be easier for scientists both to protect the species and conduct research. Nevertheless, the professor declare that if scientists do that the population of this tree cannot resist the disease that would appear. Trees and other species can survive from different disease because of the diversity that is present in a certain region.
In conclusion, although, the text suggests three ways in supporting the decline of Torreya, the lecturer believes that non of them is persuasive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 473, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
.... Consequently, the global warming will effect all the regions in the same way. The...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 315, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...rive in that new environment that would effect other trees and animals that live there...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25328947368 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63972218684 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.549097505 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9411764706 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348366124409 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110833329371 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692747241976 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18435993888 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634172672586 0.0443174109184 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.