There is a writing in which it is stated that appearing on television brings benefits to professors, universities and public. On the contarary, in the listening passage the lecturer opposes this idea. Summarize the point mad in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage.
In this set of materials, the writer and the lecturer are discussing if the professors should join to the television programs, or not. While the author states that it will be beneficial for professors themselves, for universities and for students, the lecturer opposes this with several explanations and examples.
Firstly, according to writer if a professor appears as a guest on a tv program, he/she will get reputation, because wider audience will watch him/her than the students are only on campus. On the contrary, the lecturer rejects this idea. She claims that being on tv shows will not be good professors themselves, because they will get reputation from the fellow professors only. Also, due to the tv programs are not educational, they will be seen an entertainment show by the audience.
Secondly, the writer points out that universities also gains reputation from the professors who join the tv programs, because the universites receive positive publicity. In contrast with author, the lecturer states that if the professors join tv programs in their all times, they will waste their times. Thus, there will be no great time for professors to investigations or deal with the university business, so that will cause to lost reputation for universities.
Lastly, the author claims that public gains from professors' appearing on tv, due to the fact that they talk about deep and thoughtful issues rather than the superficial ones. However, the lecturer opposes this idea, because in tv shows there are not deep or thoughtful subjects are debated, even professors talk about not intellectual issues.
All in all, while the writer thinks that professors appearing on tv brings professors themselves, universities and public to gain, the lecturer claims that it causes several problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the fellow professors only. Also, due to the tv programs are not educational, the...
^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...versites receive positive publicity. In contrast with author, the lecturer states that i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29268292683 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89772739365 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484320557491 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.25165562914 559% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1338104574 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.583333333 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15891192393 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782129402994 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476099131543 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108141635062 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347489036466 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.