Thr reading passage and the lecture are both talking about using technique called burning mirror by Creek to defense themselves from Roman navy The writer has several reasons to debate thgis story and says it just myth However the lecturer has another opi

Essay topics:

Thr reading passage and the lecture are both talking about using technique called " burning mirror" by Creek to defense themselves from Roman navy. The writer has several reasons to debate thgis story and says, it just myth. However, the lecturer has another opinion, She claims, all reasons mentioned in article are unconvincing.
I the beginning, the author states, burning mirror need wide shape with precise parablic curvature. ancient Greeks were not had advance technology to make like this device. This argument is challenged by professor. She says, Greek could make wide mirror from multiple pieces of small mirrors. Furthermore, these peices easily shape as parabolic curvature.
In addition, the writer asserts, burinng mirror require at least ten minuts to set the ships made of wood on fire. furthermore, the ship sould be unmoved. He says, this is impractical. The professor refutes this notion. She states, Greek ships made of other materials rather than wood. For example they made of birck. Birck caught fire quickly. It set on fire just in one second. After that fire can spread easily to wood in the other parts of ship.
Finally, the author points out, Creek used common weapon like shooting on ships by using flaming arrows. They do not need to use burning mirror. The author says, Roman were familiar with that common weapons. Moreover, when Creek use burning mirror will surprise enamy with this device. Therefore, they believe this device is more effective.

Thr reading passage and the lecture are both talking about using technique called " burning mirror" by Creek to defence themselves from Roman navy. The writer has several reasons to debate thgis story and says, it just myth. However,the lecturer has another opinion, She claims, all reasons mentioned in article are unconvineince.
I the beginning, the author states, burning mirror need wide shape with precise parablic curvature. ancient Greeks were not had advance technology to make like this device. This argument is challenged by professor. She says, Greek could make wide mirror from multiple peices of small mirrors. Furthermore, these peices easily shape as parabolic curvature.
In addition, the writer asserts, buring mirror requir at least ten minuts to set the ships made of wood on fire. furthermore, the ship sould be unmoved. He says, this is impractical. The professor defutes this notion. She states, Greek ships made of other materials rather than wood. For example they made of birck. Birck caughs fire quicly. It set on fire just in one second. After that fire can spread easily to wood in the other parts of ship.
Finally, the author points out, Creek used common weapon like shooting on ships by using flaming arrows. They do not need to use burning mirror. The author says, Roman were familiar with that commen weapons. Moreover, when Creek use burning mirror will surprise enamy with this device. Therefore, they believe this device is more effective.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-15 talelaldabous 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...is story and says, it just myth. However,the lecturer has another opinion, She claim...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entioned in article are unconvineince. I the beginning, the author states, burn...
^^
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ancient
... shape with precise parablic curvature. ancient Greeks were not had advance technology ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mirror requir at least ten minuts to set the ships made of wood on fire. furtherm...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...to set the ships made of wood on fire. furthermore, the ship sould be unmoved. He says, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cly. It set on fire just in one second. After that fire can spread easily to wood in ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly to wood in the other parts of ship. Finally, the author points out, Creek us...
^^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... believe this device is more effective.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, at least, for example, in addition, talking about

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1867219917 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39699742735 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639004149378 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 3.25607064018 369% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 21.2450331126 47% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6882342924 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 56.8181818182 110.228320801 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.9545454545 21.698381199 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285475912603 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665835956676 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115848856764 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200257540639 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.231573740908 0.0443174109184 523% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 53.8541721854 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.64 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.498013245 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.