The article states that Chevalier was controversial figure and he invented many events to make his life more exciting and glamorous. The author provides reasons to support. The professor refute each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that Chevalier was wealthy and he spend his money in gambling. He borrowed considerable sum of money from Swiss merchant. The professor refute this point by saying that Chevalier spend a huge amount of money in gambling and sold his property to get money. When he ran out of the cash, he had to borrow money from Swiss merchant for few days because he was waiting for his money to arrive.
Second, the article posit that it is impossible to remember each and everything conversation happend between Chevalier and Voltaire. The professor explains that Chevalier used to write down everything on every night. He used to keep his notes so that he could remember.
Third, the reading says that, Chevalier had a number of politically well connected friends in venice and Chevalier could have offered a bride. The professor opposes this point by explaining that Chevalier escapsed from jail and jail was repaired as soon as he escaped.
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their emplo 68
- Modern transportation and shipping has made the world a better place to live. 70
- Integrated Reading Passage : Are you getting a good night's sleep?Sleep is a naturally recurring state characterized by reduced or absent consciousness, relatively suspended sensory activity, and inactivity of nearly all voluntary muscles.It is distinguis 80
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading.In 1939, David O Selznick produced a film of Margaret Mitchell’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel, Gone with the Wind. The movie proved to 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...The author provides reasons to support. The professor refute each of the authors re...
^^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...vides reasons to support. The professor refute each of the authors reasons. First, ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or refute each of the authors reasons. First, the reading claims that Chevalier...
^^
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...laims that Chevalier was wealthy and he spend his money in gambling. He borrowed cons...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...oney from Swiss merchant. The professor refute this point by saying that Chevalier spe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e was waiting for his money to arrive. Second, the article posit that it is imp...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p his notes so that he could remember. Third, the reading says that, Chevalier ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 197.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00507614213 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59526423099 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568527918782 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9373569922 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1666666667 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 7.06452816374 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.091040224923 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390130080414 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354711502792 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651171462348 0.162205337803 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282773917476 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.