In this set of materials, the reading passage says that online encyclopedias have a lot of issues that make them without value compared with the printed encyclopedias and it provides 3 reasons to support this. On the other hand, even though online encyclopedias are far away to be perfect, some small errors can be acceptable and, in fact, they are better than traditional books. She refutes each reason on the passage.
First of all, the passage states that because of the absence of academic credentials the information there is inaccurate. On the other hand, the professor says that all encyclopedias, online and offline, both have problems with errors but online books are easier to correct and the printed are not. As a result, if you bought an encyclopedia with some mistake you lost your money.
Second, the writer claims that online products may receive attacks from hackers. The Lecturer says that nowadays this is simple to correct, actually it is easy to avoid because there are written in some formats that nobody can change. In addition there are some editors that can eliminate the malicious changes on the original text.
Third, the reading passage says that online material creates a false impression that what is neither important and educational became to be this. The professor says that books have a limited space and the writers decide what is going to be there and this limits the information and the variety of subject. On the other hand, online encyclopedias have unlimited space and this creates great options about the subject, in fact, this is one of the strong things on online encyclopedias.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...some formats that nobody can change. In addition there are some editors that can elimina...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, may, second, so, third, in addition, in fact, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61824695418 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535055350554 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1816585665 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.916666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151381840941 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548188344111 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053005882913 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095596090853 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401715028172 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.