The article states that Torreya Taxifolia started to die out and there are some ways to preserve them form extinction and provide three ways of support. However, the lecture explains that none of these ways are satisfactory and refute each of the author's ways.
First, the reading claims that we can reestablish Terreya Taxifolia in the same location that was thrived for thousand years. However, the lecture refutes this point by saying that they are so many changes in climate and that lead to dry out some wet land and also increasing overall temperature by the global warming. Therefore, this proposed way could not be possible.
Second, the article that moving to different location could be the way to preserve them from extinction. However, the lecture states that changing the location of some species could be detrimental to the existence plant of that area. According to the lecture, in one case when they change some plant location, that specific plant spread out and extinct some other plant which they were endanger of extinction.
Third, the article posits that preserving in research center could be good way. The lecture oppose this point by explaining that the diversity and population of this species is the reasons that scientist could not preserve them in the research center. The lecture explains that there is not enough capacity in these centers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... the same location that was thrived for thousand years. However, the lecture refutes thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his proposed way could not be possible. Second, the article that moving to diffe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'endangered'.
Suggestion: endangered
...xtinct some other plant which they were endanger of extinction. Third, the article po...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
...h center could be good way. The lecture oppose this point by explaining that the diver...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11946902655 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44086213712 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522123893805 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6683594818 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.181818182 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.