The article states that TT is endanger of becoming extinct and we have to save them and provides 3 ways of support.
However, the professor explains that these way are not satisfactory enough to do and refute each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that one way to save this species of plant is to reestablish them in the same location. On the other hand the professor refutes this point by saying that this is going to be so unlikely because of the fact that so many moist places are going to become dry and the reason that this happened is because of the change of climate in regional scale and global warming change that could change the property of the climate in some area.
Second, the article posits that we should move them into some different locations. However, the professor asserts that human had the same experience with other types of plants but the truth is that this change in location could have some unpredicted result and illustrate that point with the one example about some plant that when they changed their location spread so quickly and killed some of the species that were there before and they were endanger of extinction themselves.
Third, the reading claims that maybe it could be a good idea to preserve them by maintaining them it the research center but the professor oppose this point by saying that the population of TT can not resist disease and also because of their population and diversity of these planet it could be really hard to accommodate them in the research center. She states that no research center has the capacity to accommodate to these type of plants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'endangered'.
Suggestion: endangered
The article states that TT is endanger of becoming extinct and we have to save...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 38, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this way' or 'these ways'?
Suggestion: this way; these ways
... However, the professor explains that these way are not satisfactory enough to do and r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...ng that this is going to be so unlikely because of the fact that so many moist places are going to becom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 317, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...e dry and the reason that this happened is because of the change of climate in regional sc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 389, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...r location spread so quickly and killed some of the species that were there before and they...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 446, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'endangered'.
Suggestion: endangered
...es that were there before and they were endanger of extinction themselves. Third, the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 271, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this planet' or 'these planets'?
Suggestion: this planet; these planets
...se of their population and diversity of these planet it could be really hard to accommodate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74647887324 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35474677503 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482394366197 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.38631255 49.2860985944 256% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.5 110.228320801 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5 21.698381199 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126034519564 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561175366368 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242153617039 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623904260323 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337008064777 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.3589403974 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.