Recently there has been a tone of debate as to on of the work of Rambrandt. More specifically, in regards to this passage, the writer of passage puts forth on the idea that the painting may not be the work of Rambrandt. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point out there are some serious flaws about the writer's claim. In fact, the lecturer thinks that the painting is one of the Rambrandt' work, and adresses, in detal the trouble with each point made by the author of the reading text.
First and foremost, the writer states that there is somthing inconsistent about how the woman dressed in the painting. Some professional in the same field, however, stand in firm opposition to this claim. In the listening passage, for example, the lecture believes that there is no abnormaly about the woman fur dress. she explains that the woman dress in not part of original painting and does not concern with the work of painter.
One group of scholars, represented by the author, assert that light and shadow in the painting do not fit togrther. Of course, not all experts in the same field think that this claim is accurate. Again, the lecturer explained that in the original painting everything is realistic and that part of the woman's face is removed from the original painting. she goes on by saying that the original work reflect the way he usually painted.
Finally, the author wraps his argument by positing that the painting is consisting of some parts which glued together. Not surprisingly the professor take issue with this claim by contending that the original painting is consisted from one part and actually that exact type of wood use for the other painting of painter.
To sum up, both author and lecturer hold conflicting idea about the painting.It is so vivid that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...e work of Rambrandt. More specifically, in regards to this passage, the writer of passage put...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...no abnormaly about the woman fur dress. she explains that the woman dress in not pa...
^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... is removed from the original painting. she goes on by saying that the original wor...
^^^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... argument by positing that the painting is consisting of some parts which glued together. Not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...old conflicting idea about the painting.It is so vivid that they will have trouble...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, in fact, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77881619938 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47073691657 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498442367601 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0711023811 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.266666667 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.