The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.
"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising".
According to memo from the advertising director of Super Screen Movie Production Company, people attendance to Super Sceen-produced movie has diminished since that last years although they received good review form critics and they believed that people do not want to see these movies because thay do not know anything about the quality of movies and to pursue this goal they want to expand their advertising in order to attract more people to their movies. But some answers stay unanswered.
Firs of all,why do they think people are gonna watch these movies when they know about the critics opinions? As a matter of fact, a large amount of people who are eager to watch some movies do not care about the critics review. For example you can see so many movies that critics love them so much but people do not show any attention to them.
Secondly, what do they think that adverting these movie in public is going to be helpful to encourage people to attended? There is no evidence that could support the fact that advertising is going to be effective anyway. For instance you could see so many movies with a large amount of money invested in advertising but they do not get attentions of people.
Third of all, Why do they think that it is not because of the quality of these movies? In contrast with critics good review, it would be possible that these movies have low qualities that people are not eager to see them only because they do not think these are good enough. For example you can see many movies that critics accolade them in their reviews but people are not enthusiastic to watch them.
To sum up, statements as stands now, is flawed and for having a better conclusion and evaluation over this subject we are going to need more information and without these evidences, we ca not go any further.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , why
...me answers stay unanswered. Firs of all,why do they think people are gonna watch th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this movie' or 'these movies'?
Suggestion: this movie; these movies
...ndly, what do they think that adverting these movie in public is going to be helpful to enc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ause of the quality of these movies? In contrast with critics good review, it would be p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 316, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'critics'' or 'critic's'?
Suggestion: critics'; critic's
...or example you can see many movies that critics accolade them in their reviews but peop...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: CA_PRP[2]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'can'?
Suggestion: can
...rmation and without these evidences, we ca not go any further.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, second, secondly, so, third, thus, for example, for instance, in contrast, as a matter of fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 320.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6625 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36903857081 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471875 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 102.052546378 60.3974514979 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.21951772744 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196013186853 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699086244894 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865601515824 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115292084463 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114795404566 0.0667264976115 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 100.480337079 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.