The article and the lecture are both deal with the cause of little ice age. While the author of the article thinks that there are three specific reasons for the cooling climate earlier, lecturer opposes the author's claims. In his opinion, these reasons are outdated.
First, the author of the reading claims that because of disrupting of ocean currents, the climate shows warming effects that direct glaciers' melting. Furthermore, it is stated in the article that these melted glaciers move to the Gulf Stream, which cause the little ice age. In contrast, the lecturer argues that Gulf Stream theory only explains partially the cause. Additionally, he maintains that the cooling effect only happens in Northern part, but it cannot explain the Southern part.
Second, the author mentions that volcanic eruption emits large amount of dust. On top of that, he adds that by releasing dusts and sulfur gas, the hidden sunlight leads to decrease in temperature. However, the lecturer calls his argument into question by saying that volcanic eruption makes visual effect. Further, he remarks that during that period, no one reports about signs of volcano eruption such as colorful sunset and brown snow.
Finally, the writer asserts that decline of significant human population is one cause of the cold climate. In addition to that, it is mentioned in the article that overgrown trees in the area where once used as agricultural purposes leads to reduce in greenhouse effect which keeps Earth's atmosphere warm. As opposed to the author, the lecturer holds that there was no enough time for causing the little ice age by dissolving the problem. He highlights that the trees are unable to grow in such a short period of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pinion, these reasons are outdated. First, the author of the reading claims ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it cannot explain the Southern part. Second, the author mentions that volcani...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h as colorful sunset and brown snow. Finally, the writer asserts that decline...
^^
Line 7, column 506, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rees are unable to grow in such a short period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08450704225 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39251170934 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3271554381 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2666666667 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.