The reading passage and the lecture have a discussion on the solutions to avoid birds from running into the glass window. The reading mentions three potential theories. On the contrary, the professor considers none of them would be effective with certainty.
First, the author suggests that switch regular glass to one-way glass. However, the opinion has been opposed by the professor with new proof, the professor says that one-way glass is similar to a mirror, and birds can not understand the difference, so there will still be accidents. Thus, the reading's opinion has been challenged heavily.
Moreover, the reading claims that painting glass with colorful lines is an option, while the lecturer states that birds will consider the glass as an open hole and try to go through it. Meanwhile, with such action, windows will have to make in small sizes, which might affect lights from going inside the building. Hence, the reading has been refuted again.
Finally, the author believes that creating a magnetic field can prevent such activity. On the other hand, the professor in the listening material maintains that birds only use magnetic to navigate when they are on long-distance travel, such as from a cold climate to a warm one. In short-distance, they use their eyes as tools.
Therefore, the speaker departs totally from the opinions on the topic made in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readings'' or 'reading's'?
Suggestion: readings'; reading's
...here will still be accidents. Thus, the readings opinion has been challenged heavily. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, as to, in short, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13215859031 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52334094208 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607929515419 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.2376613686 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6153846154 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4615384615 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.