There has been a constant drumbeat that the best way to travel is by joining a tour group with a guide. Some people support the statement, others don't. From my perspective, I firmly stand against the opinion and I will elaborate on the viewpoint in the following paragraphs.
Admittedly, some people might consider a tour with a guide can be a convenient method to travel and only cause more charges. However, traveling alone or planning the trip by self will not take too much time and also make the budget more useful. Money that reduces can be put to use while the trip is on.
Moreover, traveling individuals help explore the native culture. Without a guide doing the planning for you, we have to prepare the whole schedule and search for transportation information previously. With this preparation, we can become familiar with the environment that we are approaching. As we are there in person, with knowledge collected previously, we can push our communication with local residents to a deeper degree, and the connection between the two different cultural backgrounds is always a unique experience.
In addition, having unexpected occurrences during the trip can be interesting. Compared to the schedule decided by others, the one that is organized by self has more potential factors that could influence the whole operation with positive impacts. To illustrate, imagine meeting a local resident and the two of you become friends, the person insists that you experience a traditional activity that is private to natives. Such circumstance is not likely to happen if you travel and participate with a group of people that share the same language as you.
From what has been discussed above, we can safely draw a conclusion that having a trip with a guide is not the best way to travel. Because of the experience of the place, tradition, and culture will depart totally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...me people support the statement, others dont. From my perspective, I firmly stand ag...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03194888179 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86985265511 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565495207668 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1735855225 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4375 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1875 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0903276196221 0.236089414692 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310373395096 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248284212032 0.0737576698707 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0520623415135 0.150856017488 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185515130086 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.