There has been a constant drumbeat about what is the appropriate measure to do when a speaker delivers incorrect information during class or meeting. Some people hold the point of view that interrupting immediately is beneficial, others consider keeping silent more politely. However, from my perspective, I prefer to inform the speaker after the meeting, which is the most appropriate way to do it.
First of all, interrupting and correcting immediately might embarrass the speaker. When the mistake has been broadcast the speaker is likely to be unaware the information is incorrect, questioning the professor in public might damage one's prestige. Needless to say, the speaker usually is superior, making the person embarrassed in front of the people is not a wise strategy to take. Opposing during the activity is likely to cause chaos and delay the schedule, not to mention the pace will be totally ruined.
Moreover, maintaining silence will let the mistake spread. The main purpose of the interaction is to deliver the information most importantly the correct message. By obtaining incorrect information, possible misunderstandings are likely to occur which might lead to significant disaster, also if we always choose to ignore the disinformation, the whole society won't benefit from it, It is important to set the right attitude when it comes to similar situations. Hence, saying nothing to the situation is clearly not an option.
Eventually, ask the speaker in person after the meeting to prevent wasting other people's time. Time is limited, arguing in the middle of the meeting wastes not only one's time but also everyone who participates in the activity. Furthermore, what if the professor is right and the student misunderstands the question. After a serious brainstorming then approaches the professor can prevent putting ourselves into a difficult position.
From what has been discussed above, we can safely draw a conclusion that waiting until the class or meeting is over is the best strategy to take compared to other options.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ng the professor in public might damage ones prestige. Needless to say, the speaker ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he student misunderstands the question. After a serious brainstorming then approaches...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 43.0788530466 26% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31288343558 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0057781183 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579754601227 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3448192103 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132069296224 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403142246028 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0198176267971 0.0737576698707 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681188432903 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00674112527819 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.