TOEFL T P O 50 Integrated Writing Task

Essay topics:

TOEFL T P O 50- Integrated Writing Task

Both reading and lecture discuss problems and solutions of sending humans to Mars. The author claims that this project would require solving an array of problems the Moon mission did not have to face and provides three reasons of support. The professor states that the mission is challenging, but there are many ways to solve it and refutes each reason.
First, the reading explains that round trip to Mars and back takes at least two years, and it is difficult to bring enough supplies such as food. The speaker contends this idea by saying that there is a kind of plant called hydroponics that can help astronomers. Roots of these plants grow in the water, and it does not need soil. They need little space to live, and also they can recycle water; therefore, people can drink it. Hydroponics can also release oxygen and make fresh air.
Second, the passage states that astronauts would be in the zero-gravity environment for many months on the Mars mission, which has a negative effect on the human body. The lecturer denies this point and claims that there are many space stations in the space, and they can spend many months in the mentioned places. Also, they learn many techniques to live in zero gravity without a problem.
Third, the author describes that astronauts on a mission to Mars would be exposed to a dangerous level of space radiation, which is emitted by the Sun. The professor opposes this idea and explains that radiation will not be dangerous all the time. The dangerous radiation will happen occasionally. Since astronauts have space crafts, they can monitor all the solar radiation by the Sun. The space crafts have a shield. Astronauts can work on the project, and if they realize that radiations are increased, can stay on space crafts until dangerous radiations pass.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, third, at least, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85993485342 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42354032976 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537459283388 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5217699617 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7647058824 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.