TOEFL TPO 10- Integrated Writing Task
The passage discusses that a small animal named otter that lives in waters started declining. Also, the passage thinks there are two plausible reasons for describing this phenomena. the first one is environmental pollution and the second one is predatore attack. The text claims the invironmental pollution theory is a correct idea, while the professir rejects this idea by stating these animals diminished because o the predators. So, the professor rejects all the passage's reasons and provides three reasons.
First, the passage claims there are a lot of pollutant sources along the cost and they can produce harmful materials. So, these harmful materials kill the animals. However, the passage rejects this idea by stating that if this theory was true we could see dead boddy of these animall along side coast. But there are not dead boddy.
Second, the reading asserts there are other animals that declines and it is a document for accuracy of pollution theory. While the lecture suggests there is another answer for this question. The professor states that because human prey whale, it causes unbalances in prey and predation cycle. Consequently, many animals that have nothing to eat prey other small animals. So, declining in the number of snimals is explained by predators theory.
Third, the reading contends that researchers believe the pollution hypothesis could describe the uneven pattern of the animal decline, while the professor refutes this idea. The teacher explains that the location of these animals has a key role in their declination. For example, in shallow rocky places there are no evidence of declining in these animals but in other places there are documents that the number of these animals decline. This theory confirms that in different places the availability of preys for predators make them good bates. So, the text's reason is false.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...re two plausible reasons for describing this phenomena. the first one is environment...
^^^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... reasons for describing this phenomena. the first one is environmental pollution an...
^^^
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere are a lot of pollutant sources along the cost and they can produce harmful ma...
^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: ALONG_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alongside'?
Suggestion: alongside
...e could see dead boddy of these animall along side coast. But there are not dead boddy. S...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing asserts there are other animals that declines and it is a document for accura...
^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'predators'' or 'predator's'?
Suggestion: predators'; predator's
...n the number of snimals is explained by predators theory. Third, the reading contends th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21262458472 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51957381849 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531561461794 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8613990605 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5789473684 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8421052632 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203973448119 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600887060026 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402851371449 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125038316196 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0110460262326 0.0443174109184 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.