The articles states that reduced the number of working day from five to four would provide benefits to companies, country and employees and provides reasons of support. However, the professor explains that is not such a good idea and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that shortened weekend would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert and thus reduce costly errors. The professor refutes this point by saying that hiring new employees would increase cost health insurance, amount of new offices, more space and more computers.
Second, the article posits that this solution would offer a help in reducing the amount of unemployment rate. However the professor says that hiring new employees would cost the country very much and he argued that it possible to do the same amount of five days’ work in just four days by work extra time.
Third, the reading states that shortened weekend would give the employees more free time for improving the quality of their life. The professor opposing this point by explaining that many risks could occur as the economic may be affected and the employee may lose his job, also it may affect his health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'state'.
Suggestion: state
The articles states that reduced the number of working day ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ducing the amount of unemployment rate. However the professor says that hiring new empl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 201.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08457711443 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3442498879 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592039800995 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6978724833 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461804630815 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196757117734 0.0996497079465 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106781125631 0.0662205650399 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269290243062 0.162205337803 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573796796612 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.