In this reading, many employees are willing to replace five- day week’ work with four- day week’ work and less pay, declaiming three reasons from the company, the country and the individual point. However, the lecture refutes all of the explanations and insists that the change will do no good.
From the first point, if we force the company to employ four- day employees instead of five- day employees, they have to spend a lot more money on providing more training and medical care, which is totally contrary to the point in the reading. The company need to have more office space and more computers, too.
Secondly, the individuals may not be pleasant either. After the employees take the four- day job, they will be expected too much to even take the responsibility as the five- day employees will take. Working overtime will be a usual phenomenon in the future and no addition job could be provided. The job will be so unpleasant and could not realize the dream in the reading.
Thirdly, the country are supposed to have the preparations to take the risk of reducing employment chances. When someone is used to work four- day a week, his job ability could be reduced and he is more likely to lose his job, because the company will prefer five- day week employees in order to continue to finish the task in time.
In conclusion, the change to four- day week will not have good effects in company, country and individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ual point. However, the lecture refutes all of the explanations and insists that the chang...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76892430279 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5170203618 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521912350598 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9427130331 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.818181818 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336580452936 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125798175947 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824710271543 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193680905567 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425161390562 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.