The reading passage states that in America, employees like and want to work for four-day in a week. This can be possible by paying them 80 percent of their income. However, the lecturer believes this situation would force companies to spend more in order to add more employees and health benefits would also be another impact.
First, the author of the passage expresses, working 4 days in a week would allow employees to be more rested and keep them alert. Employees would make less mistakes.
However, the lecturer says because of more free time employees might have more mistakes because they will leave their mind from the work they do.
Second, reading says that hiring more employees will not be an affect to the company. Because they pay only 80 percent of their income, hiring new employees will cover these limited payments.
In contrast, the lecturer believes having more employees definitely requires bigger places and more equipment like computers.
Third, the reading passage claims that hiring more employees will reduce unemployment and more people can easily find a job.
However, the lecturer says it does not mean unemployment will be finished by doing so. Also, the company’s executives will expect from their employees to do the same work like when they used to do while they were working five days in a week.
In conclusion, the reading passage believes employees would contribute their companies more by having better ideas. Also, they could have spare time and this freedom would improve their quality of living. And this would also give them the availability of pursuing private interests and enjoy the activities.
In contrast, the lecturer claims that more free time includes some risks. It does not mean their quality of life would improve because, they will have no stability. Because of these reasons, they could lose their jobs and could more likely acquire economic damage.
To sum up, the author of this reading believes reducing work days in the U.S. will definitely give both the companies and to the employees better conditions. However, the lecturer states that working less can be harmful in many ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...d keep them alert. Employees would make less mistakes. However, the lecturer says b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, in conclusion, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 5.04856512141 456% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1186440678 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40032555486 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449152542373 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0433049195 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.09492273731 244% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 4.33554083885 300% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509740932932 0.272083759551 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176100343651 0.0996497079465 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077518754769 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239001497116 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10557034679 0.0443174109184 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.