The lecture and the reading both talk about whether or not a four-day workweek is better than normal five-day workweek. At this point, the author states that idea will work and create more benefits for both employees and company, provides three reasons support. However, the professor explains that will bring more disadvantages and casts doubt on each of the author’s reasons.
First, the professor presents the negative side of decreasing company’s profit, refutes the reading’s general claim that managers will save more money because of higher concentration and alertness in working. In this case, the professor mentions that the company will surely spend more resources, such as bills for medical, insurance, and training, on running their system with the four-day schedule work.
Second, the lecture says employees will be able to apply other available part time jobs when they work only four days a week for eight hours per day. This confronts the reading’s claim that they will spend weekend for their family or leisure activities. In fact, the professor asserts that employees will have to choose working overtime to make difference or finish their five-day work in only four-day schedule which makes employees feel uncomfortable.
Third, the lecture challenges the reading’s claim that individual employees will have better opportunities when the four-day workweek is available. At this point, the professor mentions that positions of manager are only available for employees with five-day workweek. Consequently, people who work five days per week have more opportunities for promotion than other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...lecture and the reading both talk about whether or not a four-day workweek is better than norm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...s will be able to apply other available part time jobs when they work only four days a we...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to work'.
Suggestion: to work
...erts that employees will have to choose working overtime to make difference or finish t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, second, so, third, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58232931727 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83666647079 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5818867277 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.363636364 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380971641144 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164507165031 0.0996497079465 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787383864661 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255752422626 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849282270801 0.0443174109184 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.