Both the lecture and the reading discuss a method to approach and solve a new project, such as working in a group. At this point, the article states that there are plenty of benefits when people join a team-work and provides three reasons support. However, the lecture explains that it always exists many problems and disadvantages and casts doubt on each of the author’s reasons.
First, the lecture presents the negative side of teamwork as waste time because of too many meetings, refutes the reading’s general claim that processing of project will move quickly when it is solved by a group. In this case, the professor mentions that people have to spend more time to decide how to solve a problem that increases the total time of that project.
Second, the professor says that people who contributed most efforts to a successful project will not be named. This confronts the reading’s claim that participating in a group brings opportunities for member to be rewarded. In fact, the professor asserts that there are some people who do not do any effective things will also receive the same rewarding.
Third, the lecture challenges the reading’s claim that influential people will make a better decision than a personal ideal. At this point, the professor mentions that influential member maybe impacts directly on a highly potential idea of other’s members by ignoring them when they contribute an opinion about that one-way decision. It will make the whole job break down.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, third, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13008130081 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80364058952 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6793174509 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.727272727 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265358055859 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941101384942 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365519193153 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150830230713 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216692015227 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.