The reading passage suggests that decreasing the days of work will increase the company profit, decrease the unemployment and also give an opportunity to employees enjoying their life more. However, the lecturer cast doubt on each of the author's idea.
First and foremost, the article states that if the working days will decrease, the salary of workers would decrease by 20 percent which will save the profit of the company. On the other hand, the lecturer made a counterclaim to this point by saying that the company should hire more workers in order to not harm the intense of company which requires them to create more space, add many more computers and also spend more money on the health insurance of workers which will not decrease even though the employees work four days or five.
Secondly, the reading passage indicates the changes will help to reduce the amount of unemployment by hiring more workers. In contrast, the professor argues that the company will not prefer to hire new employees because it may harm the company profit as he mentioned former, some of them offers to their employees to work for an additional hour instead which will not affect the rate of unemployment.
Lastly, the reading passage suggests that employees have more free time to spend it with their loved ones or on their personal enjoyment things if they reduce the number of days spends at work. The professor refutes this point by explaining this will reduce the quality of workers' life and may harm the chance to advance in work. Moreover, according to the professor companies will prefer to have a five days worker instead of four days because they have more chance to develop and stay stable at work which affects the mind of workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... the lecturer cast doubt on each of the authors idea. First and foremost, the artic...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 10.4613686534 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87162162162 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36782633104 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47972972973 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.0177729 49.2860985944 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.222222222 110.228320801 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8888888889 21.698381199 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365475852603 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150625249886 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086711314108 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232175212728 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245558275272 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.