In this rapidly developing society, the lack of information causes a problem for people. Even though some people agree with that the many different sources provide a person with much information, however, others disagree. From my point of view, the different news resources will not make a person well-informed for the following aspects.
Above all, there are many resources that include fake pieces of information. Those may cause a problem for the entire population by spreading fake news. For example, the information about the end of the world spread through my country in 2012. Many trust this and sell all their possessions, then spend them in trivial things before they die. Because of this fake information, the economic abyss took place in my country which was hard to recover.
Furthermore, many reliable sources developed which include a broad range of information such as BBC. I think people do not have to waste their time reading variable resources to get trusty news. In the past, people spend less time and less confused about the information than the past, because they only get news from the newspaper.
Finally, the many different resources break the trust of people. When people find out the information is fake, they do not trust the information on that page or site which makes the page unpopular. For example, when I saw the video or a post on the internet that are scientifically false, I tend to ignore it and block the site.
All in all, the cons of the many sites include information outweigh the pros. Even though the different resources give news from diverse angles, I think this is not that necessary because everyone must have an own perspective about the information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... though some people agree with that the many different sources provide a person with much info...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun trust seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many trusts'.
Suggestion: Many trusts
...orld spread through my country in 2012. Many trust this and sell all their possessions, th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ews from the newspaper. Finally, the many different resources break the trust of people. Wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, well, for example, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 286.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98951048951 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64425605374 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531468531469 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.806179057 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.1875 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180290665962 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613792820594 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495765123212 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10993370985 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579836763057 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.