The lecture discusses about how reducing work days from 5 days to 4 days can turn out to be unprofitable to the company and also the employees. The lecturer thus shows his disapproval for the following idea mentioned in the paragraph and provides related explanations to reason his stand.
The lecture and the paragraph totally contradict each other. The paragraph mentions the advantages of having employees work for four day a week for 80% of their pay whereas the lecture tells the opposite.
Firstly the paragraph states that offering a four day workweek will help company economically has the employees will be paid only 80% of their pay. This will be beneficial for company in increasing the no of employees but will not have to spend extra money on their salary as their salary will account from the remaining pay of the other employees. While the lecture opposes the statement, stating that increasing the no of employees will also increase other expenses on healthcare, office furniture and devices etc. which will indirectly affect the company profit.
Secondly the article states that the company will be profited as the employees will be more rested and alert and will be prone to less mistakes. On the other hand the lecturer explains that even if the worksheet is reduced to 4days , the company may rise its expectation from the employees to work more in these 4 days and this may result in a more work pressure for the employees.
Finally as the paragraph supports employees to have a four day workweek , providing benefits like free time and proper rest, the lecture weakens the proposal by showing the disadvantages including poor assurance of job stability and reduction in chances of promotions as the company will opt to choose an employee with 5day workweek for stable monitoring rather than a 4day workweek employee.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ed explanations to reason his stand. The lecture and the paragraph totally contr...
^^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...aragraph totally contradict each other. The paragraph mentions the advantages of ha...
^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...eneficial for company in increasing the no of employees but will not have to spend...
^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... statement, stating that increasing the no of employees will also increase other e...
^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e rested and alert and will be prone to less mistakes. On the other hand the lecture...
^^^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ven if the worksheet is reduced to 4days , the company may rise its expectation fr...
^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ectation from the employees to work more in these 4 days and this may result in a...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ore work pressure for the employees. Finally as the paragraph supports employees to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ts employees to have a four day workweek , providing benefits like free time and p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00974025974 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67303371868 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512987012987 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.8122527643 49.2860985944 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.272727273 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405556359055 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170732717291 0.0996497079465 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105230733629 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240728088409 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570508734711 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.