The lecture states that employees that work four-day per week are most useful for the companies than other employees and provide some reasons. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on this assertion and challenges all the reasons in the reading.
At first, the author of the passage believes that four-day week workers are beneficial for the companies. Because they accept to earn 80 percent of the salary in order to work four-day each week. On the other hand, the professor acclaims that the companies will employ more staffs, consequently they will buy more computers and other things; hence, they will waste a lot of money.
Second, the lecturer refutes the reading passage statement that the unemployment rate will fall with this policy. He claims that this policy will not enlarge job openings because companies will not choose a path that will cost more. Companies will rather start to find different options such as making their workers do overwork and pay the extra money. To make matters worse, companies might actually expect more from their employees to work as much as they would work five days during the four day period.
Finally, the passage believe that four-day employees will have enough time for spending with their family; hence, they will enjoy their life. However, the professor opposes this assertion and believes that the employees will not earn enough money; consequently, they will not be happy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rkers are beneficial for the companies. Because they accept to earn 80 percent of the s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10169491525 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30227895039 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550847457627 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2039613835 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.454545455 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415907623231 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160435447237 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113361097412 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252061013116 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371219196277 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.