In this set of materials the reading describes about the advantage of working four days a week, and changes that it could provides to employees, in contrast with it, the listening discusses about this new policy which represent a significantly risk to company and employees.
In the reading passage is mentioned many employees want to work four days a week, in spite of receive less salary. A lot of companies are agreeing with this new policy. This changes in the working hours could bring benefits not only for workers, even the companies could be improved their profits. The reason is, the employees would make fewer costly errors in their work. Not only the companies will receive benefits, furthermore the country could reduce the unemployment rates because new workers will cover the hours of the others employees who will be working only four days a week. Finally, this policy of four days workweek will be the best decision for the employees in exchange for extra time free. They may enjoy passing time with their family; in conclusion this will provide a best quality of life.
Contrary to the belief in the reading passage, the lecture refutes the fact that this will benefit to the company or even the employees. First, the four-day workweek, could affect the company economy just because they will expend more due to adding new workers, new workers will need training, the company will spend in medical benefits to the extra workers, in addition, the company require more computers and more equipment for the new people. Second, reduce the schedule won't improve the quality of life owing the employees will lost their job stability. For example: the company director will show preference by worker who chose five days a week, this kind of people will make the same work than the four days worker, it could represent decremented of work stability. In the other hand, people who works more day a week will be chosen to ascend, will take advance in his carrier in contrast with the other one. This finally represent a significantly risk to company and employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
... days a week, and changes that it could provides to employees, in contrast with it, the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('risk') instead of another adjective.
...s about this new policy which represent a significantly risk to company and employees. In the rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...receive less salary. A lot of companies are agreeing with this new policy. This changes in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 787, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...family; in conclusion this will provide a best quality of life. Contrary to th...
^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...uality of life owing the employees will lost their job stability. For example: the c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 939, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('risk') instead of another adjective.
...h the other one. This finally represent a significantly risk to company and employees.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'kind of', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.284237726098 0.261695866417 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.12661498708 0.158904122519 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0723514211886 0.0723426182421 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0335917312661 0.0435111971325 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0258397932817 0.0277247811725 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.105943152455 0.128828473217 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0258397932817 0.0370669169778 70% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.42041865672 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0232558139535 0.0208969081088 111% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.136950904393 0.128158765124 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0568475452196 0.0158828679856 358% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0129198966408 0.0114777025283 113% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2075.0 1645.83664459 126% => OK
No of words: 351.0 271.125827815 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91168091168 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.04852973271 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.336182336182 0.374372842146 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287749287749 0.287516216867 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162393162393 0.187439937562 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.102564102564 0.113142543107 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42041865672 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470085470085 0.539623497131 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.3759552842 53.8517498576 90% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0714285714 21.7502111507 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.0230245482 49.3711431718 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.214285714 132.220823453 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 21.7502111507 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 53.8463573464 50.5018328374 107% => OK
Elegance: 2.23611111111 1.90840788429 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.629748029632 0.549887131256 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146768121041 0.142949733639 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0812915502469 0.0787303798458 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.567113238843 0.631733273073 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.203374938158 0.139662658121 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.307595093122 0.266732575781 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109655284062 0.103435571967 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.52619970671 0.414875509568 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.103685830366 0.0530846634433 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.504481079293 0.40443939384 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787159941745 0.0528353158467 149% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Not in a correct format.
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%) but more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.