The article states that zoos are essential and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that activists don’t believe that zoos benefit animals or society and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that animals are treated well in zoos. The professor refutes this point. He states that animals are not treated well. He explains that in a zoo, two read pandas died from exposure to rat poison. Zoo safety managers could have prevented this, but were not present. The professor explains that this proves that zoo administrators show a lack of care towards animals.
Second, the article claims that zoos are educational. However, the professor says that zoos are still seen as entertainment. The animals in zoos attract visitors. They aren’t the animals that the public should really learn about. Zoos send the message that animals can be used for our own purposes. He states that though some zoos attempt to inform, we can’t understand them in zoos because they are in artificial and misleading exhibits.
Third, the reading claims that zoos protect endangered species. The professor says that this claim is problematic. He explains that the Taamarin is one successful example but that overall, zoos have a poor success rate. Zoos possess a small number of an endangered species so they tend to interbreed, which results in birth defects. Also, he states that zoos offer no advantage to saving animals in their native habitat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d refutes each of the authors reasons. First, the reading states that animals a...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s show a lack of care towards animals. Second, the article claims that zoos are...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in artificial and misleading exhibits. Third, the reading claims that zoos prot...
^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... have a poor success rate. Zoos possess a small number of an endangered species so they tend to i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'third', 'well']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265017667845 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.190812720848 0.158904122519 120% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0494699646643 0.0723426182421 68% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0318021201413 0.0435111971325 73% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0424028268551 0.0277247811725 153% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127208480565 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0212014134276 0.0370669169778 57% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.54912310711 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0141342756184 0.0208969081088 68% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.095406360424 0.128158765124 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0141342756184 0.0158828679856 89% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00353356890459 0.0114777025283 31% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1500.0 1645.83664459 91% => OK
No of words: 241.0 271.125827815 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.22406639004 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.410788381743 0.374372842146 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.323651452282 0.287516216867 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182572614108 0.187439937562 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107883817427 0.113142543107 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54912310711 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576763485477 0.539623497131 107% => OK
Word variations: 57.362958469 53.8517498576 107% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0529801325 146% => OK
Sentence length: 12.6842105263 21.7502111507 58% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8036404655 49.3711431718 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9473684211 132.220823453 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6842105263 21.7502111507 58% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.578947368421 0.878197800319 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 45.0493557545 50.5018328374 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.56 1.90840788429 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275775837082 0.549887131256 50% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0930362946349 0.142949733639 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0568810580535 0.0787303798458 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.516964696496 0.631733273073 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.120481054464 0.139662658121 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118963760355 0.266732575781 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412702411165 0.103435571967 40% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.382875830785 0.414875509568 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0455712849414 0.0530846634433 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206562199796 0.40443939384 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235059012871 0.0528353158467 44% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.49668874172 229% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.2958057395 155% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.