The reading passage and lecture are both talking about hours of work during the week which employees have mandatory work load of eight hours a day for five days during the week. routinely. The reading states that it will increase company benefit because the employees will have less error and they are well rested and the mandatory law is to accept the offer of 80 percent of normal wage.
First of all, the reading passage the employees feel more alert and it will decrease any costly error. However the lecturer cast doubt on this by saying that company benefit probably increases but thy will need more worker and they will add much worker with health benefit and more office space is needed and by hiring new employees is costly.
Moreover, the author states that it will decrease unemployement risk. The lecturer refutes this by saying 4 days worker do not have stability of their job and they are paid less than 5 day workers.
Finally, personal life of 4 day workers are much better than 5 day workers and they can invest on private insurance.
On the other hand, the lecturer states that constitutional supervision is addded to 5 day workers
Essay evaluation report
the reading passage the employees feel more alert and it will decrease any costly error.
in the reading passage, the employees feel more alert and it will decrease any costly error.
will add much worker
will add many workers
Sentence: However the lecturer cast doubt on this by saying that company benefit probably increases but thy will need more worker and they will add much worker with health benefit and more office space is needed and by hiring new employees is costly.
Error: thy Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Moreover, the author states that it will decrease unemployement risk.
Error: unemployement Suggestion: unemployment
Sentence: On the other hand, the lecturer states that constitutional supervision is addded to 5 day workers
Error: addded Suggestion: added
flaws:
No. of Words: 201 250
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 8 12
No. of Words: 201 250
No. of Characters: 933 1200
No. of Different Words: 109 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.765 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.642 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.273 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 67 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 22 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.277 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.44 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.73 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.127 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Routinely
...rs a day for five days during the week. routinely. The reading states that it will increa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... and it will decrease any costly error. However the lecturer cast doubt on this by sayi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worker' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worker
...it probably increases but thy will need more worker and they will add much worker with heal...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'talking about', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272300469484 0.261695866417 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.164319248826 0.158904122519 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0892018779343 0.0723426182421 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0422535211268 0.0435111971325 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.037558685446 0.0277247811725 135% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112676056338 0.128828473217 87% => OK
Participles: 0.037558685446 0.0370669169778 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.31595112494 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0093896713615 0.0208969081088 45% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.093896713615 0.128158765124 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0328638497653 0.0158828679856 207% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00469483568075 0.0114777025283 41% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1156.0 1645.83664459 70% => OK
No of words: 201.0 271.125827815 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75124378109 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04852973271 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.338308457711 0.374372842146 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.223880597015 0.287516216867 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.119402985075 0.187439937562 64% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0696517412935 0.113142543107 62% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31595112494 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 49.9712816457 53.8517498576 93% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 22.3333333333 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9528451075 49.3711431718 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.444444444 132.220823453 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 0.878197800319 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 44.7213930348 50.5018328374 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.73076923077 1.90840788429 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470516853091 0.549887131256 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.139875996864 0.142949733639 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.121048250315 0.0787303798458 154% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.698845473269 0.631733273073 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.279804146574 0.139662658121 200% => Sentences are changing often in a paragraphs.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214793721134 0.266732575781 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13212797658 0.103435571967 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.241575414292 0.414875509568 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0733527248562 0.0530846634433 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267111877972 0.40443939384 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130099643098 0.0528353158467 246% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.