In this set of materials is talking about the productivity and rewards. The reading passage supports the fact that rewards improve the job performance. Turn, the listening refutes the reading given reasons, examples and results researches about this field.
The reading point out that is useful give reward to the workers because it has a good impact on the attitude and work of the people. For instance, there are enterprises, which tend to do that to improve the productivity, such as incentives as money, company stock, more privileges, promotions or luxury vacations. According to the passage, the results obtained with rewarding, is better job attitudes, motivations and finally it is traduced in productivity.
In other hand, conversely with the passage, the lecture refutes the fact that rewarding can improve the job performance. In fact the people who are rewarding does not like it, they consider that rewarding means that his work is not respected. They want to be paid by a hard or extra job. By the way, some research which supports the lecture belief. On those studies is proved that the productive decrement when a worker is being rewarded. So people fell instead, they are being manipulated or punish. Is shown in that studies, Besides, studies revealed that the productivity is reduced the quality and amount. For that reason the research recommend does not make rewards because it tend to reduce than improve a good work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 683, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tends'?
Suggestion: tends
...ommend does not make rewards because it tend to reduce than improve a good work.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'conversely', 'finally', 'so', 'for instance', 'in fact', 'such as', 'talking about', 'by the way']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.275092936803 0.261695866417 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.185873605948 0.158904122519 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0408921933086 0.0723426182421 57% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0297397769517 0.0435111971325 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0297397769517 0.0277247811725 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.10780669145 0.128828473217 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0594795539033 0.0370669169778 160% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73970634358 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0223048327138 0.0208969081088 107% => OK
Particles: 0.00371747211896 0.00154638098197 240% => OK
Determiners: 0.133828996283 0.128158765124 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00371747211896 0.0158828679856 23% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0148698884758 0.0114777025283 130% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1445.0 1645.83664459 88% => OK
No of words: 237.0 271.125827815 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0970464135 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.379746835443 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.320675105485 0.287516216867 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194092827004 0.187439937562 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122362869198 0.113142543107 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73970634358 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565400843882 0.539623497131 105% => OK
Word variations: 55.1241493282 53.8517498576 102% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.9285714286 21.7502111507 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8138611862 49.3711431718 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.214285714 132.220823453 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 21.7502111507 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.642857142857 0.878197800319 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 48.9960819771 50.5018328374 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.80303030303 1.90840788429 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405009028126 0.549887131256 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112496873264 0.142949733639 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0781281085648 0.0787303798458 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.525186820496 0.631733273073 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159533614308 0.139662658121 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180992927443 0.266732575781 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713828150107 0.103435571967 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.469569350488 0.414875509568 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0549107673973 0.0530846634433 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326642434826 0.40443939384 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444658000136 0.0528353158467 84% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Not in a correct format.
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%) but more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.