Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no exaggeration to say that friends is one of the most precious asset of one's life. As the debate over the ability to maintain longer friendship or to make friends easily continues, I cannot deny the values of both. However, as far as I am concern, I would consider it more important to have the ability of making new friends easily. The reasons are as follows.
Firstly, as I grow older, I come to realize how the ability to make friends easily can affect a person in a social setting. Take my personal experience for example. I've always been a shy person, which always discourages me on the first day of school. I remember being reluctant to introduce myself in front of the class and being a total outsider for a couple of days. If I could be more open-minded and have polished my skills in making friends, it probably will get me a lot of sincere friends during the time at school. Thus, it reveal the fact that if one has a hard time reaching out to people, one may be at a disadvantageous situation as people always needs to socialize in different stages.
Next, the ones with the ability to make friends easily are more possible to explore different possibilities in life. Compared to those one who like to maintain in their small social group, getting in touch with new people may be the track for one to connect to the world differently. My dad used to say that he have friends all over the world since he loved to meet new people in his 20s. By that, he has been to many countries and know a lot of cultures since then. Whenever hearing his stories of traveling, I always admires and hope that I could be like him. From this instance, the benefits of making new friends is clearly seen.
Furthermore, I believe that people inevitably will have different friends in each stage of life. People rarely have friends that can accompany each other for a long time. Thus, it appeals more important to have the ability to make new friends. In this way, we may all get accompany whenever we are.
In conclusion, I believe that the benefits of making new friends outweigh the one of maintaining friendships over a long period. It is because one can hardly be by one's side, and the advantages of making new friends are enormous. Thus, I oppose the statement stated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ds is one of the most precious asset of ones life. As the debate over the ability to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...ake my personal experience for example. Ive always been a shy person, which always ...
^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'been'.
Suggestion: been always
...my personal experience for example. Ive always been a shy person, which always discourages ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reveals'?
Suggestion: reveals
...nds during the time at school. Thus, it reveal the fact that if one has a hard time re...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'admire'
Suggestion: admire
...ring his stories of traveling, I always admires and hope that I could be like him. From...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53510895884 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55650172982 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476997578692 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5367523988 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4347826087 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9565217391 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86956521739 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310356351946 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919381423421 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747641103507 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18743566403 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494249358882 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.