The article discusses the benefits of companies offer 4 day workweek to their employees and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that offering 4 day work week will not provide any benefits for economics or employees and he refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that the option of working 4 day workweek will increase companies profits because employees would feel more relax and focus, so they would make few errors. The professor, on the other hand, explains that this change will force companies to spend more money than before. Since their employees would work only 4 days a week, adding new employees would be necessary. And consequently, they would have to spend more money on providing training, and buying health insurances to their new employees. In addition to, more office spaces and new computers also would be in need. HE concludes these adding costs would be cut from companies profits.
Second, the article posits that offering 4- day work week would create jobs vacancies that need to be filled by hiring new employees, and ultimately will reduce the unemployment rate. The professor refute this point by stating that choosing 4 day work week will not provide opportunities for hiring new people. Most companies would ask their employees either to do overtime, or companies would rise their expectations. As a result, jobs duties that have supposed to be done by 5 days, Now, employees would have to complete it by 4 days.
Third, the reading avers that by offering employees 4 day workweek, they would have free time to spend it with their families and beloved ones. The professor opposes this point by explaining 4 day workweek would presents drawbacks, such as reducing the quality of life for employees and also decrease jobs stability for them. In other words, it would hurt their careers advancement. the professor emphasizes that companies prefer highly employees that working 5 days workweek, moreover, they will only promote employees that working full time. And finally, the first person to loose job, the one who work 4 day workweek.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'workweek' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'workweeks'.
Suggestion: workweeks
...s the benefits of companies offer 4 day workweek to their employees and provides three r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...ofessor states that offering 4 day work week will not provide any benefits for econo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'workweek' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'workweeks'.
Suggestion: workweeks
...claims that the option of working 4 day workweek will increase companies profits because...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 199, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...ce the unemployment rate. The professor refute this point by stating that choosing 4 d...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 253, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...int by stating that choosing 4 day work week will not provide opportunities for hiri...
^^^^
Line 6, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld rise their expectations. As a result, jobs duties that have supposed to be don...
^^
Line 8, column 59, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'workweek' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'workweeks'.
Suggestion: workweeks
... avers that by offering employees 4 day workweek, they would have free time to spend it ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 198, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'workweek' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'workweeks'.
Suggestion: workweeks
... opposes this point by explaining 4 day workweek would presents drawbacks, such as reduc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 213, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'present'
Suggestion: present
...oint by explaining 4 day workweek would presents drawbacks, such as reducing the quality...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 384, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...t would hurt their careers advancement. the professor emphasizes that companies pre...
^^^
Line 8, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies prefer highly employees that working 5 days workweek, moreover, they will onl...
^^
Line 8, column 535, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ill only promote employees that working full time. And finally, the first person to loose...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 579, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... time. And finally, the first person to loose job, the one who work 4 day workweek.
^^^^^
Line 8, column 613, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'workweek' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'workweeks'.
Suggestion: workweeks
...on to loose job, the one who work 4 day workweek.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, in addition, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 5.04856512141 436% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 347.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15850144092 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66807123051 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510086455331 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2271233534 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.294117647 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 4.19205298013 334% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.614769571959 0.272083759551 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225645825722 0.0996497079465 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103429653863 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.415036791814 0.162205337803 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770789527359 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.