Both the reading and the lecture discuss the four-day workweek policy. While the reading states that this new policy would benefit the companies and the employees, the lecture cast doubts this idea by saying that this new policy would not increase the economy of the companies and would not improve employees way of life.
First of all, the reading claims that the four-day workweek policy would increase the profits of the companies since employees will commit fewer errors regarding that they will have more time to rest during the week. The professor counters this idea by saying that having four-day workers will affect the economy of the companies because they should invest more money in training, medical benefits, office space and computers.
Secondly, the reading passage posits that hiring more people with four-day workweek will not cost extra money due to the fact that they will be paid only eighty percent of the total salary. Moreover, the reading adds that the country will benefit because of the decrease of unemployment. The professor opposes to that idea by saying that having more employees will increase companies costs. Furthermore, The companies could ask employees who work four day to work the same as if they were a five days employee since they likely refuse to add one more employee making the work of the employee more stressful.
Finally, The reading passage says that employees that work 4 days per week will have more free time to spend with their beloved ones.However, the professor explains that this new policy will affect job stability since the companies will prefer to give better oportunities to employees who work five days; as a result, the four day employees will not have the chance to get a promotion or even to get an administrative position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...e time to spend with their beloved ones.However, the professor explains that this new p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04362416107 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39474382389 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463087248322 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.990648632 49.2860985944 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.0 110.228320801 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1111111111 21.698381199 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06452816374 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488719205948 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21005568631 0.0996497079465 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110372851517 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31988778049 0.162205337803 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365223478517 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.3589403974 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.