Both the reading and the lecture discuss endotherm animals. While the reading states that dinosours can be considered endothermic animals and provides three reasons of support, the lecture cast doubts this idea by saying that dinosours can not be classified as a endotherm animal because of the evidence found by scientists and refutes each of the reading’s reasons.
First, the reading passage claims that dinosours should be considered endotherm animals because some fossils of them have been found in polar regions; as a result, they should have a constant temperature in their bodies in order to survive in this enviroment. The professor opposes to that idea by saying that the temperature at that time was not as high as today so they could have survive without any problem. Moreover, The professor mentions that dinosours could have migrated or hibernated when cool weather begins.
Second, the reading passage says that the leg position of the dinosours have a connection with endothermic animals because it allows animals to do well in physical activities such as running. The professor goes againist this idea by saying that the leg position was not related with an endothermic characterist but with the way dinosours could bear their huge bodies.
Finally, the reading asserts that dinosours had a special bone structure called haversian canals that is a structure found in many endothermic species and is used to accelerate the growth of endothermic animals. The professor counters this claim by saying that dinosours indeed have this haversian canals, but also they have a special bone called rings growth that is the one responsible for the height of the dinosours.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...that dinosours can not be classified as a endotherm animal because of the evidenc...
^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'survived'.
Suggestion: survived
...not as high as today so they could have survive without any problem. Moreover, The prof...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th endothermic animals because it allows animals to do well in physical activitie...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, well, while, as to, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25461254613 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71380075406 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494464944649 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3480427894 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.222222222 110.228320801 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 21.698381199 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255541848122 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117923861082 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635322542694 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168127375204 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470722987793 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.3589403974 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.