TPO- 02 Integrated essay. In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages.
The reading and lecture are both about group of people doing projects together. The author of the reading believes that by creating this system it can have many advantages to the company. However, the lecturer casts doubts about the claims made in the article, saying that his arguments are inaccurate compared to facts.
First of all, the author points out that working together in a group can provide more creativity. This is because information and opinions will be discussed with different people and Ideas will be more creative outcome will result. The point is being challenged by the lecturer. He says that some member of the group don't cooperate in group discussions and they are referred as "free rider" In addition, projects don't move quickly because there are many process and steps like going under meetings and consensus to other member of the team and it takes a lot of time for an agreement to take place.
Secondly, the author contends that staff will not be shy to give their output with the group. The article notes that the every person in the group will be held responsible for every decisions they will make as a team and no single person will be held liable for a bad decision. However, the lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that if member of the group excel in their field and the recognition will not be awarded to that one person, but the credit will go to the whole team. Furthermore, he argues that staff are upset with this trend due to the company did not recognize their hard work.
Finally, the author states that it is very rewarding for members. The article notes that every one who do their job properly can "shine" and be given recognition. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that there are 2-3 individuals in the group that are more influential gets their voices heard the most. He puts forth the idea that if those persons believe that the idea would not work and they will spread the news to other members and the idea will be quickly not be pushed forward. In addition, If project move smoothly as planned and other members of the group wants to suggests for some improvement then this influential people ignored their inputs, but if the project did not work properly and all the members in the group are to be blamed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rate compared to facts. First of all, the author points out that working toget...
^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
.... He says that some member of the group dont cooperate in group discussions and they...
^^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...;free rider' In addition, projects dont move quickly because there are many pro...
^^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun process seems to be countable; consider using: 'many processes'.
Suggestion: many processes
...cts dont move quickly because there are many process and steps like going under meetings and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1373.03311258 138% => OK
No of words: 401.0 270.72406181 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73815461347 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42537646146 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483790523691 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 419.366225166 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.062688972 49.2860985944 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.764705882 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407342107953 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120970114366 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696130223791 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243053244214 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681172533706 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.