In this set of materials the reading describes that working in a group is better than alone to obtain more beneficial results whereas in the listening discusses that not always is better for a member work in a project as a group. Both, lecture and reading have own point of views.
In the reading passage is mentioned the best form to achieve significant goal is through work team. Are given some reasons to this affirmation. One of the motives given is, in collaboration the people improve their results because each one add knowledge, expertise and skills. Working as individually way cannot provide the same results. In other hand, working together could be faster than alone, since the group is form by more than one brain, this mean, more efficient to save time and spend less on it. However, working in a group bring more risk to take decisions, the reasons is because people could be more confidence to got the responsibility as a group than alone. For all above, when the people keep up in collaboration have more possibility to shine.
In contrast with the reading passage, the listen argument that the teamwork will receive a good recognition as whole, but no names will be mentioned. Thus, it is unfair to the people who work and give the best effort to achieve the goals than another one who never give any input. Furthermore, this way of work could result more slow to accomplish, in spite of will be more brains, that not mean that will expedite the work, contrary with this, is difficult reach an agreement. In the other hand, if there is a fail, all the members of the group have responsibility about it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...n have more possibility to shine. In contrast with the reading passage, the listen ar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... In contrast with the reading passage, the listen argument that the teamwork will receive...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at not mean that will expedite the work, contrary with this, is difficult reach a...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'whereas', 'in contrast', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23197492163 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.156739811912 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0783699059561 0.0723426182421 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0470219435737 0.0435111971325 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.012539184953 0.0277247811725 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134796238245 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0344827586207 0.0370669169778 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58059143204 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0313479623824 0.0208969081088 150% => OK
Particles: 0.00313479623824 0.00154638098197 203% => OK
Determiners: 0.134796238245 0.128158765124 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.025078369906 0.0158828679856 158% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00940438871473 0.0114777025283 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1629.0 1645.83664459 99% => OK
No of words: 285.0 271.125827815 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71578947368 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.305263157895 0.374372842146 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.221052631579 0.287516216867 77% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.119298245614 0.187439937562 64% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0877192982456 0.113142543107 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58059143204 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 53.6041265472 53.8517498576 100% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.9230769231 21.7502111507 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1433849107 49.3711431718 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.307692308 132.220823453 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 21.7502111507 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.692307692308 0.878197800319 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 44.028340081 50.5018328374 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.85507246377 1.90840788429 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.623104353083 0.549887131256 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0959997696072 0.142949733639 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0783659263846 0.0787303798458 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.526523089573 0.631733273073 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172309631536 0.139662658121 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.26781352828 0.266732575781 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102065777563 0.103435571967 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.473333138741 0.414875509568 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.048949406149 0.0530846634433 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.486046406171 0.40443939384 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583140487989 0.0528353158467 110% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Not in a correct format.
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%) but more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.