TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people
The reading and lecture are both about creation of a group of people to build a new project. The author believes that in many organizations working together as a team has many advantages it possess. The lecturer cast doubts about the claims made in the article. He thinks that working on a project by a group of people has downside such as it will take much longer time to finish a certain project.
First of all, the author points out that collaborating in a team can lead into sharing more insights of knowledge, expertise and skills compared to a single individual crafting on a project. It is mentioned that task can be more easily more accomplished due to many people are involved and a lot of ideas can be shared to the group as a result a highly creative solution to the problem and issues can be furnished. The point is challenged by the lecturer. She says that a company made an observation on the performance of the team and they noticed that it took 6 months perform the assigned task given to them. It took long time to talk about the concerns and many meetings are made and it leads to slower movement of the project to finish. Furthermore, she argues that member of the group don't contribute their knowledge, opinions to solve the task.
Secondly, the author contends that the creative solutions come about because a group is likely to make risky decisions. The article notes that all of the members are aware that they are responsible for the decisions they are casting even if it turns out to be a wrong one. The lecturer rebuts this statement. He suggest that one or two people that are more influential on the group will drastically affect its decision making when they suggest that the idea will not work, the team will follow their lead and will quickly drop the idea.
Finally, the author states that being in a group is rewarding for the members of the team. The article establishes that members who has the confidence to showcase that they possess the ability to decide for the group will certainly feel proud and accomplished. The author also impose that individual person has a more chance to be noticed, due to their contributions and ideas will be highly be appreciated. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that if a group performs well, their performance and talents would not be appreciated by the company. She puts forth the idea if the output of the idea is good and if comes from a single person the recognition will be given to the group and this individual feels bad due to her name was not being recognized for a job well done
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'possesses'?
Suggestion: possesses
...gether as a team has many advantages it possess. The lecturer cast doubts about the cla...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... a team has many advantages it possess. The lecturer cast doubts about the claims m...
^^^
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...re, she argues that member of the group dont contribute their knowledge, opinions to...
^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...risky decisions. The article notes that all of the members are aware that they are respons...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
... The lecturer rebuts this statement. He suggest that one or two people that are more in...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 409, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd ideas will be highly be appreciated. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits tha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1373.03311258 154% => OK
No of words: 460.0 270.72406181 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60217391304 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.04702891845 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55829112831 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 145.348785872 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465217391304 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 419.366225166 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8992465224 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.421052632 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2105263158 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496697652303 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137112029701 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817706156607 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291310505669 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04371795134 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.