The lecture and the reading article both discuss the team's effectiveness in handling a project which is a common approach in companies. While the reading article states that, the team approach is advantageous than individual contribution, the lecture refutes this claim. The professor thinks teamwork hinder the pace and effectiveness of a project.
First of all, the reading claims, team can deliver work quickly than individual contributor. Expertise, know-how and wide variety of skills of team members catalyze the progress of the project. Team's risk taking ability overpasses the individual contributor aspect and can put forth creative solutions quickly. However, the lecture argues that team members take more time to agree on point and that slows down the progress.
In addition, the reading passage makes the argument that every team members share responsibilities equally and being part of team is an enriching experience. The lecture counters this point by stating, not all team members are equally enthusiastic about their work and get free pass; while the real hardworking contributors end up getting frustrated. Project’s success credit is equally shared by all members.
Lastly, the reading article argues that individual members get an appreciation for their ideas and contribution along with the team's success. But, the lecture denies the claim by pointing out that strong personality members, rule the team decisions and often the voice of other members is ignored by the influential members. Everyone shares the blame if project fails to achieve desired outcome.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
...nd the reading article both discuss the teams effectiveness in handling a project whi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
...r ideas and contribution along with the teams success. But, the lecture denies the cl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, so, thus, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54918032787 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8522234687 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3325978603 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.153846154 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304210139387 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111754896927 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624613455568 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185816201465 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603284022163 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.