The reading and the lecture are both about Rembrandt. The author of the reading concerns that there are some paintings are considered that have belonged to Rembrandt but they were not painted by him. The painting about a woman's face is an example. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He says that this painting actually belongs to Rembrandt.
First of all, the author of the reading points out that the dress of woman is not consistent. It is said that she wore a white linen cap that is a cheap thing that thing only servant used to wear, but the fur collar is very expensive. This point is challenged by the lecture. He rebuts that the pigment of the painting has shown that the fur collar was added after the painting was painted about 100 years. It is because someone would like to make the painting look more valuable.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that Rembrandt was very good at painting light and shadow. However, in the painting these element do not fit together. The lecture refutes this idea that in the original painting, simple color reflects the light on the woman's face. The light and shadow looks very realistic as what people respected.
Finally, the author of the reading states that Rembrandt never painted on several pieces of wood as people see in the woman's face painting. The lecture on the other hand, opposes this idea that someone enlarged the wood in order to make it look more valuable and grander. It fact, in the original painting Rembrandt painted the woman on a single wood. Moreover, people have found that the wood that Rembrandt painted the woman is the same tree of another his painting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...randt but they were not painted by him. The painting about a womans face is an exam...
^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ting about a womans face is an example. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ainting actually belongs to Rembrandt. First of all, the author of the reading ...
^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this element' or 'these elements'?
Suggestion: this element; these elements
...ht and shadow. However, in the painting these element do not fit together. The lecture refute...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7133105802 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25447741309 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481228668942 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.157669553 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7222222222 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2777777778 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510185429849 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174225799181 0.0996497079465 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11339354454 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329296348607 0.162205337803 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402224326361 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.64 8.42419426049 79% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.