The article states that the portrait named "elderly woman on bonet" is not belonged to the Rembrandt and it provides some specific reasons. However, the professors casts doubt on the points by saying that the portrait is painted by the artist and gives her own reasons.
First, the author explains that there is something inconsistent about the woman 's dressing way in the portrait. The professor claims that the portrait is originally created by the artist. However, Xray analysis of the colors has reaveled that 100 years later, another person has added a fur to the woman's dress, in order to show it as an expensive painting.
Second, the reading claims that knowing that Rembrandth was master of light and shadow, we find that the elements do not fit together in the portrait. Casting doubt on the point, the lecturer asserts that happened because of the adding the fur. Those two elements in the original portrait are so realistic.
Third, the author presents that the examination of the back of the portrait shows that it was painted on a wooden panel made of several pieces and they attached to each other by wood glue. Also regarding this point, the speaker explains that the person also had glued some wood pieces to the panel of the portrait to enlarge it and show it more grand and more valuable . Also, in her opinion Rembrandt's self-portrait was painted on wood pane too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ey attached to each other by wood glue. Also regarding this point, the speaker expla...
^^^^
Line 4, column 369, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...and show it more grand and more valuable . Also, in her opinion Rembrandts self-po...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85355648536 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51031206559 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556485355649 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2442610725 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.454545455 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259737362118 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931412306014 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709192519796 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139772510016 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643226918723 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.