Rembrandt was one of the famous painters of his time and the author discusses about one of his painting that was attributed to him and the evidences are against it. In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points that cast doubt on all the argument presented in the readintg passage. She states that the painting that reading discusses is Rembrandt work indeed and it was assessed closely and it is proven.
First of all, the author claims that collar fur and the woman clothes are not match. However , the speaker states this collar fur was added to the painting hundred years later by someone else. In other words, the fur was not part of the original painting and was added over the top maybe for increasing the value of painting by some one else.
Moreover, the author points out that Rembrandt was master of shadowing and the painting was not correct from light point of view. However, the professor refutes that by stating that original painting without that collar fur was perfect in terms of light and shadow and was realistic. She says added fur to original painting made that incongruency in light and shadow.
Lastly, the professor states that the glued wood peices were added at the same time of adding the fur to the painting. So, the original painting was in single large panel of wood. In fact, the large single panel of wood was dated to the time of Rembrandt's other work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vidences are against it. In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points t...
^^
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the woman clothes are not match. However , the speaker states this collar fur was ...
^^
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...is collar fur was added to the painting hundred years later by someone else. In other w...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 328, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...for increasing the value of painting by some one else. Moreover, the author points out ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, lastly, may, moreover, so, in fact, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65991902834 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2527840043 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.59638686 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9166666667 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391199594613 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16681148546 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083983972669 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256870899778 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493316234856 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.