In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points that cast doubt on the all the arguments presented about the advantage of four-day work week and states they won’t benefit the empolyees and companies.
First of all, the professor says, hiring new employees are costly and force the companies to spend more . He illustrates that the companies may pay less monthly for the less work hours of four-day work week workers but the health benefit and training and medical coverage for every new employee even who works less than others is the same and more workers need more office space and more computers which means the companies have to spend more. This counters the author’s claim.
Secondly, the professor believes the four-day work week does not provide more jobs available in the market as the companies have other options. They prefer to increase their expectations from their employees and force their worker to work more and even overtime to cover all the work and responsibilities to prevent hiring of new employee which is costly. This does not help any additional job to be created and also makes the current job unpleasant for employees. This contradicted with the writer’s point of view.
Lastly, the lecturer agrees with the more free time in four-day work week but believes this more free time does not mean better quality of life. He believes even the quality of life of these employees will decrease due to less stability in their job and fewer chances of advanced carrier and promotion. Also, in the economic downturns these employees are more prone to lose their job. This completely counters the writer's claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...doubt on the all the arguments presented about the advantage of four-day work wee...
^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ly and force the companies to spend more . He illustrates that the companies may p...
^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cover all the work and responsibilities to prevent hiring of new employee which ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02181818182 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53280047376 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516363636364 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.7094563316 49.2860985944 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.083333333 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3677385562 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12500844407 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857955503273 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227281221289 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764974946368 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.