The reading and the lecture are about the argument of the Endothermcy of the dinosaurs. The author of the reading believes that dinosaurs are Endothermas. The lecture casts doubts on claim made in the article. She thinks that no approved evidence showed that dinosaurs are Endotherms.
First of all, the author points out that fossils discovered in the polar area for an Enodthermal animal. It is mentioned that only animal that keep there internal temperature above the external environment can live in cold weather. This point is challenged by the lecture. She says the polar region where fossils were found was much warmer. Furthermore, the closer months dinosaurs could either migrates or hyopnight.
Secondly, the author contends that position and the movement of the leg. The article notes that the physical feature of the Endotherms animal allow free movement like running and for efficiency the leg must positioned underneath the body likewise dinosaurs. The lecture rebuts this argument. She suggestes that not nesseccery the position of the leg to classified an animal within the Endotherms. She elaborates this by mentioning that the dinosaurs body build like that to support weight and large size.
Finally, the author states that bone structure for the Endotherms. The article establishes that the Endotherms bone include Havans canal which dwell nerves and blood vessels to ensure rapid growth same in the dinosaurs. The lecture, on the other hand, points that it is true the presence of the havana canal beneath the thick bones. She puts forth the idea that in cold weather it slows or stop grow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...elieves that dinosaurs are Endothermas. The lecture casts doubts on claim made in t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, likewise, second, secondly, well, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18702290076 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57985058532 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56106870229 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3677503395 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5555555556 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372221560322 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922853353965 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647386473065 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193639912224 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594282467364 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.